A Year of Silence: The Unresolved Death of Joshua Èjuojo Daniel-Ejigbo and Nigeria’s Judicial Crisis

Share

In the corridors of Nigeria’s justice system, the file concerning the death of 17-yearold Joshua Èjuojo Daniel-Ejigbo gathers dust—a potent symbol of institutional failure that continues to raise alarming questions about accountability, influence, and the rule of law in Africa’s most populous nation.
On April 30, 2024, Joshua Èjuojo Daniel-Ejigbo, a first-year Computer Science student at Veritas University in Abuja, died under circumstances that remain contested. The university’s official position maintains that Joshua was struck by a falling barbell while exercising unsupervised in the campus gymnasium.
However, this account was immediately challenged by an independent autopsy conducted at the National Hospital Abuja, which documented evidence of “asphyxia due to high cervical spinal cord injury and transection resulting from blunt force trauma to the upper back and neck regions.”

Most disturbingly, the autopsy revealed a broken neck with 360-degree dislocation—injuries that forensic literature typically associates with deliberate violence rather than accidental trauma.

Court records show that two separate lawsuits have been filed by the Ejigbo family — one at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (Suit No: FCT/HC/CV/2869/2024) and another at the Federal High Court (Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1898/2024). Both cases have experienced what can only be described as extraordinary procedural delays.

The first case, filed against Veritas University, Abuja as the sole defendant, seeks ₦7.425 billion in damages for alleged negligence and breach of duty of care. This suit has seen only preliminary hearings in twelve months despite the gravity of the allegations.

The second, more expansive lawsuit names six defendants: The Minister of Education Federal Republic of Nigeria, The Federal Ministry of Education, National Universities Commission, Veritas University Ltd/GTE (Also Known as Veritas University), Archbishop Ignatius A. Kaigama, and Zachariah Samjumi Nyantiso.
This suit includes allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of statutory duty, and personal liability of the university’s directors.

See also  Nigeria's Creative Industry set to contribute $100 billion to GDP by 2030 - Minister Musawa

The pattern of delays observed in both cases — lengthy adjournments has effectively transformed the legal process into a protracted battle with no resolution in sight.

In May 2024, the family’s legal representation submitted a formal petition to the House of Representatives, detailing serious allegations including:
Conflicting accounts of Joshua’s death between the university’s narrative and witness statements,
Evidence of severe trauma inconsistent with an accidental gym injury,
Alleged negligence in the FCT Police Command’s investigation, particularly regarding a suspect identified as Paulinus Ali,
Claims that the university attempted to intimidate the family into silence.
One year later, no formal response or action from the House Committee has been documented.
The Federal High Court lawsuit has brought to light another disturbing dimension of the case. Legal documents reviewed for this article allege that Veritas University was operating without proper authorisation at the time of Joshua’s death.
According to court filings, the provisional license granted to the university in 2007 expired in 2010, while the current legal entity operating as Veritas University was not incorporated until October 4, 2021 (Registration Number 1847242).

These allegations directly implicate the regulatory responsibilities of the National Universities Commission (NUC) and the Federal Ministry of Education, both named as defendants.
The NUC, tasked with ensuring compliance with educational standards, has declined to comment on these allegations, citing “ongoing legal proceedings”.
The criminal investigation into Joshua’s death has faced equally troubling impediments. Documentation related to the case indicates that despite initial arrests, all detainees hastily charged without proper investigations leading to a trial designed to be terminated on technical grounds. The police have not publicly identified any suspects or persons of interest in the year since the incident.
Particularly concerning are allegations contained in the House petition that FCT Police Command failed to thoroughly investigate the alibi of a prime suspect or retrieve crucial electronic evidence that could have verified his whereabouts at the time of Joshua’s death.
At Gudu Cemetery in Abuja, where Joshua was laid to rest on May 8, 2024, his parents yesterday at his graveside said “We come here to remember, but also to recommit ourselves to finding the truth,” says Honourable Daniel Oneal Ejigbo, Joshua’s father.
“The system is designed to exhaust us into giving up, but they do not understand that for parents, justice for your child is not optional—it is as necessary as breathing.”
Mrs. Ifeoma Ejigbo, Joshua’s mother, speaks of the psychological toll of fighting against institutional inertia: “Each delay, each unanswered question is another trauma. But we cannot and will not stop seeking answers. What happened to our son could happen to any child in Nigeria if we allow this culture of impunity to persist”.
As the Ejigbo family marks the sombre anniversary of their son’s death, their legal team continues to pursue multiple avenues for accountability.
The unresolved death of Joshua Èjuojo Daniel-Ejigbo forces a national reckoning with uncomfortable questions about Nigeria’s justice system. In a constitutional democracy, the uniform application of law regardless of wealth, status, or institutional affiliation is not merely aspirational—it is foundational.
As this case enters its second year without resolution, it stands as a stark reminder of the distance between Nigeria’s constitutional promises and its institutional realities.

See also  Dangote Refinery makes case for 100% Nigerian crude …as Senate probes alleged sabotage in petroleum industry By Our Correspondent The Dangote Refinery has made passionate appeal to the Senate, NNPCL, NUPRC, NDMPRA and other stakeholders in the industry to help supply the refinery its crude oil need 100 per cent from Nigeria. Group Strategy Officer, Dangote Refinery, Aliyu Suleiman made the appeal at the Senate Ad-hoc Committee probing alleged economic sabotage in petroleum industry at the Senate Complex, Abuja on Wednesday. He said right now, the refinery bought about 50 million barrels of crude out of which about 60% comes from NNPC. Mr. Suleiman who expressed gratitude to NNPC for their support, added that, essentially, all they are asking is for them to get their crude requirement from Nigeria 100%. “Let's be very clear, we are happy to pay fair prices. We hope that we'll work with the regulator and we'll get their support so that the refinery can get 100% of its crude from Nigeria and buy the crude from companies that produce it in Nigeria not from international middlemen. “We count on support of the committee, the regulators and other stakeholders to ensure that the refinery succeeds, because if it does, aside from the other obvious benefits, like forex generation, job creation and the rest, most importantly, there is the psychological benefit of making, giving Nigerians, Africa in general, the confidence that we can succeed. Giving a progress update on the refinery, Mr. Suleiman said since the refinery started full trial production in January and then full time production started in March, we processed about 50 million barrels of crude. “We have produced about five million tons of petroleum products. And these petroleum products have been sold to various parts of the country and Jet oil has been sold in Europe since May. He said other products have been sent to places as far as Asia, US, Brazil, and so on. So the refinery has been making a lot of progress. He emphasized the importance of deliberately protecting local industries for the over all economic development of the country. According to him, “the US, for example, has done that, to protect their own industries against attack by China that subsidize their own industries and then sends them to the US. So that's the first question. We want to urge the committee to consider if we deserve protection against them”. He posed three basic questions that revolved around protection of local industries for the consideration of the committee and Nigerians at large. The questions are: “Do local refineries deserve protection from NUPRC? “Should Nigeria protect its infant industries in order to improve investment? “Should local refineries have preferential access to Nigerian crude? He said Dangote found itself competing against Russian products that were produced with oil that is valued at $60. “We all know that because of the cap that has been put Russian oil, the value of Russian oil today in the market is $60. And that's what Russia is using to produce their products and those products are being sent in large quantities into Africa to compete with products that are produced in refineries that buy crude at $90. “We don't think this will be a fair competitive environment and I think that when you have such unfair competition, it is normal to put protective measures. “I think even in the animal world, the moment a new baby is born, they don't just go and leave it out in the wild. “What we want is to sell more of our products in Nigeria, because we believe we can do that, we can compete. And even though there are concerns that have been expressed around monopoly, that is a problem that has been identified. The right thing to do is to say, how do we address this problem? If monopoly is a risk, how do we address this risk while at the same time ensuring that we protect our domestic industries? The good thing is that in the PIA, there are provisions around that, you can monitor and take action if you feel there's monopoly.

For the Ejigbo family, the search for justice continues not only for their son but for the principle that every Nigerian life deserves equal protection under the law.
The question that remains is whether Nigeria’s justice system will rise to meet this fundamental challenge, or whether Joshua Èjuojo Daniel-Ejigbo will join the long list of cases where justice delayed has ultimately meant justice denied.

Hon Daniel Ejigbo writes in from Abuja.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *